Motivaciones y Percepciones de Estudiantes de Escuelas Insulares en Chile sobre la Educación STEAM.
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El artículo analiza las motivaciones y percepciones de los estudiantes de escuelas insulares en Chiloé sobre la educación STEAM (Ciencia, Tecnología, Ingeniería, Arte y Matemáticas). Se observa un alto interés por las actividades STEAM, especialmente aquellas que incluyen componentes prácticos y trabajo en equipo. Sin embargo, persisten estereotipos de género que limitan la participación femenina en áreas como la tecnología. A pesar de esto, la mayoría de los estudiantes reconoce la igualdad de capacidades entre niñas y niños en matemáticas y ciencias. La inclusión de actividades variadas y la promoción de un ambiente inclusivo son cruciales para fomentar la participación equitativa en STEAM. El estudio sugiere que la exposición temprana y el apoyo continuo son esenciales para aumentar la participación femenina en estas áreas, y destaca la importancia de estrategias educativas que desafíen los estereotipos de género y promuevan la diversidad y la equidad.
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Este trabajo tiene licencia DE Atribución/Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Cómo citar
Referencias
Aguilera, D., Lupiáñez, J., Perales-Palacios, F., Vílchez-González, J. (2024). IDEARR Model for STEM Education—A Framework Proposal. Education Sciences. 14(6):638. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060638
Bertrand, M., y Namukasa, I. (2023). "A pedagogical model for STEAM education", Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 16(2), 169-191. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-12-2021-0081
Breiner, J., Harkness, S., Johnson, C., & Koehler, C. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
Brühwiler, C., & Blatchford, P. (2011). Effects of class size and adaptive teaching competency on classroom processes and academic outcome. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.004
Bybee, R. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2009). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342
Connolly, T., Boyle, E., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004
Dare, E., Keratithamkul, K., Hiwatig, B., & Li, F. (2021). Beyond content: The role of STEM disciplines, real-world problems, 21st century skills, and STEM careers within science teachers’ conceptions of integrated STEM education. Education Sciences, 11(11), 737. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110737
DeCoito, I. (2024). STEM Education: Curriculum and Pedagogy. In: Global Perspectives on STEM Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60676-2_4
Duschl, R. (2019). Learning progressions: Framing and designing coherent sequences for STEM education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0005-x
English, L. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
English, L. (2023). Ways of thinking in STEM-based problem solving. ZDM—Mathematics Education. 55(7), 1219–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01474-7
Ferrada C., Díaz-Levicoy, D, y Carrillo-Rosua, J. (2021) Integración de las actividades STEM en
libros de texto. Revista Fuentes, 23(1), 91–107.
Ferrada, C., & Díaz–Levicoy, D. (2022). STEM and Robotics in Elementary Education: A Teacher’s view to a classroom experience. 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). https://doi.org/10.23919/cisti54924.2022.9820525
Ferrada, C., Carrillo-Rosúa, J., Díaz-Levicoy, D., & Silva-Díaz, F. (2021). Robótica aplicada al aula
en Educación Primaria: un caso en el contexto español. Sociology and
Technoscience, 11(Extra_2), 240-259.
Ferrada, C., Carrillo-Rosúa, J., Díaz–Levicoy, D., & Silva-Díaz, F. (2023). Una ciudad sostenible STEM para mejorar la actitud hacia las ciencias las y matemáticas en estudiantes de 5° y 6° de educación primaria de España. Investigações em ensino de ciências, 28(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2023v28n1p111
Ferrada, C., Carrillo-Rosúa, J., Díaz–Levicoy, D., & Silva-Díaz, F. (2020). La robótica desde las áreas STEM en educación primaria: una revisión sistemática. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21, 18. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.22036.
Ferri, R. (2006). Theoretical and empirical differentiations of phases in the modelling process. ZDM, 38(2), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02655883
Fishman, B., & Krajcik, J. (2003). What does it mean to create sustainable science curriculum innovation? Science Education, 87(4), 564–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10088
Flanagan, B., Hourigan, M., & Leavy, A. (2024). Primary teachers’ learning experiences of integrated STEM education. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X241257335
Goos, M. (2024). Reflecting on the Contribution of Mathematics to STEM Education. In: Anderson, J., Makar, K. (eds) The Contribution of Mathematics to School STEM Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2728-5_19
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C. & Baptista, M. (2010). Metodología de la investigación (Quinta edición). Ciudad de México: McGraw-Hill.
Holmlund, T., Lesseig, K., & Slavit, D. (2018). Making sense of “STEM education” in K-12 contexts. IJ STEM Ed, 5(32). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0127-2
Hynes, B., Costin, Y., & Richardson, I. (2023). Educating for STEM: Developing entrepreneurial thinking in STEM (Entre-STEM). In S. Kaya-Capocci & E. Peters-Burton (Eds.), Enhancing entrepreneurial mindsets through STEM education (15), 165–194. Springer.
Kitchen, J., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. (2018). The impact of college‐ and university‐run high school summer programs on students’ end of high school STEM career aspirations. Science Education, 102(3), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21332
Leung, A. (2019). Exploring STEM pedagogy in the mathematics classroom: A tool-based experiment lesson on estimation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1339–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9924-9
Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
Loof, H., Pauw, J., & Petegem, P. (2021). Engaging Students with Integrated STEM. Education: a Happy Marriage or a Failed Engagement? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(2). https://10.1007/s10763-021-10159-0
Martínez, C., Gómez, M., Borchardt, M., & Garzón, M. (2022). Hacia un currículum emancipador de las Ciencias de la Computación. Revista Latinoamericana de Economía Y Sociedad Digital, 3. https://doi.org/10.53857/LBUS5649
Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F., & Vílchez-González, J. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A Review of Literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522
Merriam, S. y Tisdell, E. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Nadelson, L., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M. y Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157-168.
National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612
NRC. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas (p. 13165). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2018). PISA 2022 mathematics framework (draft). https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2021-assessment-and-analytical-framework.htm
Ortiz-Revilla, J., Greca, I., & Arriassecq, I. (2022). A Theoretical Framework for Integrated STEM Education. Science & Education, 31(2), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00242-x
Pleasants, J., Tank, K., & Olson, J. (2021). Conceptual connections between science and engineering in elementary teachers’ unit plans. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00274-3
Quinn, C., Reid, J., & Gardner, G. (2020). S+ T+ M= E as a convergent model for the nature of STEM. Science & Education, 29(4), 881–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00130-w
Schoenherr, J., & Schukajlow, S. (2024). Preservice teachers’ judgments of students’ expectations of success and task values: Close relations with their personal task motivation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 148, 104659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104659
Silva-Díaz, F., Fernández-Ferrer, G., Vázquez-Vílchez, M., Ferrada, C., Narváez, R., & Carrillo-Rosúa, J. (2022). Tecnologías Emergentes en la Educación STEM. Análisis bibliométrico de publicaciones en Scopus y WOS (2010-2020). Bordón, 74(4), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.13042/bordon.2022.94198
Snyder, M. (2018). A century of perspectives that influenced the consideration of technology as a critical component of STEM education in the United States. The Journal of Technology Studies, 44(2), 42–57.
Steffensen, L. (2024). Developing Responsible Citizenship Through Integrated STEM Education Activities. In: Anderson, J., Makar, K. (eds) The Contribution of Mathematics to School STEM Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2728-5_17
Stohlmann, M. (2020). STEM integration for high school mathematics teachers. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 6(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2020.71
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research., 2(1), 28–34. https://doi:10.5703/1288284314653.
Tarango, J., Armendáriz-Núñez, E., & González-Quiñones, F. (2024). Cultura científica, alfabetización científica y perfiles de ingreso-formación-egreso: un análisis exploratorio en programas de posgrados de alta calidad en México. Ibersid: Revista De Sistemas De información Y documentación, 18(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.54886/ibersid.v18i1.4944
Toma, R., Yánez-Pérez, I., & Meneses-Villagrá, J. (2024). Towards a socio-constructivist didactic model for integrated STEM education. Interchange. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-024-09513-2
Triantafyllou S., Sapounidis T., Farhaoui Y. (2024) Thinking in Education: A systematic literature review. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología. Gamification and Computational - Serie de Conferencias. 3:659. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024659
Vasquez, J. (2015). STEM: Beyond the acronym. Educational Leadership, 72(4), 10–15.