The Pillars of Knowledge: An Integrated View of the Philosophical Foundations of Research

Main Article Content

Duber Reinaldo Sanchez Cabrera

Abstract

This article addresses the complexity of philosophical foundations in research methodology, a recurring challenge for students and researchers in training. It proposes a clear and integrated conceptualization of ontology, epistemology, and axiology, essential pillars underlying the choice and justification of any research design. The study's main objective is to unravel how these philosophical dimensions are not mere abstractions but practical guides informing the understanding of reality, the generation of knowledge, and the role of values in research. The main research paradigms—positivist (and post-positivist), interpretivist, and critical—are described, detailing for each their ontological assumptions (the nature of reality), epistemological assumptions (the nature of knowledge and the subject-object relationship, including "ways of knowing" such as rationalism, empiricism, phenomenology, hermeneutics, and critical theories), and axiological assumptions (the role of values). Key findings suggest that an explicit articulation of these foundations promotes the internal coherence of the research process and strengthens the justification of methodological decisions. It is concluded that a rigorous understanding of these philosophical pillars is indispensable for the development of sound, ethical, and transparent research, offering a robust framework for methodological reflection and practice across various disciplines

Article Details

How to Cite
Sanchez Cabrera, D. R. (2025). The Pillars of Knowledge: An Integrated View of the Philosophical Foundations of Research. Revista De investigación, formación Y Desarrollo: Generando Productividad Institucional, 13(3), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.34070/rif/.v13.i3.2025.435.%p
Section
Artículos
Author Biography

Duber Reinaldo Sanchez Cabrera, Universidad Latinoamericana y del Caribe

Duber Reinaldo Sánchez Carrera es abogado y especialista en Ciencias Gerenciales, con un enfoque en educación y divulgación científica. Originario de Venezuela, desarrollando una carrera significativa en el ámbito de la consultoría jurídica, trabajando en importantes instituciones como el Banco de Venezuela y Banco Mi Casa. Actualmente, me encuentro en proceso de obtener un Doctorado en Ciencias Gerenciales, mientras impulso proyectos de divulgación en la ciencia y la tecnología. Siempre buscando integrar mis conocimientos legales y gerenciales con una educación innovadora y accesible.

How to Cite

Sanchez Cabrera, D. R. (2025). The Pillars of Knowledge: An Integrated View of the Philosophical Foundations of Research. Revista De investigación, formación Y Desarrollo: Generando Productividad Institucional, 13(3), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.34070/rif/.v13.i3.2025.435.%p

References

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.

Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). Seabury Press. (Original work published 1960).

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Sage Publications.

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press.

Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment. (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1944).

Hume, D. (2000). A treatise of human nature. (D. F. Norton & M. J. Norton, Eds.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1739).

Husserl, E. (1970). Logical investigations. (J. N. Findlay, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1900).

Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2002). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2000). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 279-313). Sage Publications.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Beacon Press.

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Mill, J. S. (1974). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive. University of Toronto Press. (Original work published 1843).

Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Basic Books.

Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. Cambridge University Press.

Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Northwestern University Press.

Selltiz, C., Jahoda, M., Deutsch, M., & Cook, S. W. (1962). Research methods in social relations (Rev. ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Sousa Santos, B. de. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.

Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). University of Illinois Press.